|
By
Che’Rae Adams
If you can wrap
your head around this concept, then I truly
believe it will make the difference between a
good script and a great script. See if you can
reflect the content of the play in the structure
of the play. For example, in Proof, the author
structures the play, which is about the validity
of a math problem, like a mathematic proof. He
takes us on a roller coaster where we have to
add up the doubt against what we believe and
then do the math to finally solve the problem
based on the evidence that has been presented to
us. The play is masterfully crafted to reflect
the content in the form. Below is commentary
from writer and student Jon Bastian on this
subject…
Jon Bastian on
“Form Follows Function”
As a writer, the term “form follows function”
fascinates me, because my father was an
architect – and it’s from the field of
architecture that the term is derived. It, and
its inverse – “function follows form” – were the
big architectural battlefield of the 20th
Century. Without putting it in the same terms, I
think many writers have fought the same battle
without realizing they were involved.
In
architectural terms, “form follows function”
means this. If you’re hired to design, say, a
bakery, you’re not going to design it to look
like a train station. Oh, it may be a really
pretty train station, with long, gleaming
platforms and high skylights and beautiful
ticket kiosks in gleaming stained glass. But
when the bakers get there and realize that the
flour is stored on Platform A, the ovens are in
the left-luggage section and the refrigerators
are out in the switching yard, they’re going to
come back and say, “Hey – thanks for the crappy
bakery.” They cannot perform their function –
baking – because the place was designed to be
something entirely different.
It’s also
interesting to note that, again in the
architectural world, a corollary to “form
follows function” was “ornament is a crime.” The
architects were talking about unnecessary
buttresses, gargoyles and other geegaws – go
look up “Bauhaus” for more on the structural
version. But note only the word “unnecessary” in
terms of writing. Something – anything,
everything – in your writing should be
ornamental and pretty, or ornamentally ugly –
but it should never be unnecessary. See the
“story is like a river” comments in Chapter 1 on
The Concept Sentence for a reminder about
necessity.
But back to
“form follows function” as it relates to us...
When it comes
to writing, it simply means that the structural
and stylistic elements of your script should
match the content of your story. If you’re
writing a domestic comedy about a modern husband
and wife, it probably wouldn’t do to design it
as a five act classical tragedy in iambic
hexameter. Likewise, an action adventure movie
about a larger-than-life 17th Century pirate
probably shouldn’t be written in 21st Century
urban slang and laid out in elaborate flashbacks
and dream sequences.
Some of this
may seem self-evident, but it’s the other side
of the coin that gets complicated. Mainly,
finding the form that does follow your function.
This is where examining the themes and
adjectives for your story really come in handy.
The adjectives will describe the styles you’ll
lean toward, while the themes will give you
insight into the structures.
For example, if
one of your themes is “Alienation”, then you
should attempt to keep your audience
off-balance. Approach normal moments in
non-traditional ways, make characters strange
and (one time to break the rule) inaccessible.
If one of your adjectives is “Mysterious”, keep
the language oblique and withhold information –
don’t tell the audience any more than they need
to know.
Some examples
to look at: Memento. One of the themes could be
“Life with no short-term memory”, and the entire
film is structured from that point of view,
making the audience experience life exactly as
the hero does – A Beautiful Mind follows the
same strategy by only showing us events from the
protagonist’s point of view. Another example: in
La mala educación (Almodóvar’s Bad Education),
one of the themes could be “Fantasy as escape”,
and many sequences in the movie are actually
made-up versions of real events – something we
don’t know until very late in the film. Finally,
for a less literary example, a theme for Star
Wars Episode IV: A New Hope could be “A boy
becomes a hero” and, indeed, the story structure
of that entire film is admittedly lifted
directly from Joseph Campbell’s “A Hero’s
Journey.” That’s been covered in detail in other
books, but as the story begins, Luke Skywalker
actually wants to go fight for the Empire, and
has to be convinced to take up the task of
helping Princess Leia and Ben Kenobi.
As you begin to
structure your script, ask yourself, “What am I
building?” If it’s a bakery, build a bakery. If
it’s a train station, build a train station. But
look to your themes and adjectives for clues,
keep your concept sentence in mind for what is
necessary – and you should be able to make form
follow function, and avoid unnecessary ornament.
It isn’t as
hard as it sounds. You just have to let the
chosen elements assemble themselves. After all,
the one advantage we have over architects is
this: stories are not bound by the rules of
physics.
Other Examples
Here are some other well-known films and plays,
with their content compared to their structure –
their function vs. their form.
|
Title |
Function |
Form |
|
A
Clockwork Orange
|
Allegorical morality fable |
A
fairytale; our protagonist journeys into
and out of the dark woods, meeting the
same three obstacles on the way in and
the way back out |
|
North
by Northwest
|
'Wrong
man' adventure story |
The
audience is kept in the dark about what
is really going on, as is our
protagonist |
|
Citizen
Kane
|
Political
satire loosely based on real person |
Mock
newsreel documentary and fly-on-the wall
drama, but with everything
larger-than-life to reflect protagonist
Kane |
|
Mulholland Drive |
Anxious
dream of a failed actress |
Heightened-reality, saturated color,
straightforward storytelling in
chronological order – an exception to
prove the rule |
|
The
Wizard of Oz
|
Fantasy as
escape from reality |
Contrast
of "Kansas" in sepia and "Oz" in
technicolor, with the story being told
as a musical, American film's version of
surrealism |
|
Proof
|
A
mathematician doubts her sanity |
A
mathematical proof, with successive
hypotheses either proven or disproven by
what we learn in each scene. |
|
Our
Town |
Exposé of
small town life |
Play
presented on a bare stage, with no
fourth wall |
|
Camino
Real |
Symbolic
drama about everyman’s struggle against
oppression conceived as an epic journey
that never moves |
Intentionally anachronistic choice of
characters and setting, and the scenes
replaced with the concept of “blocks” on
the journey |
|
Equus |
Psychological examination of a sex
criminal turns back on the examining
psychiatrist |
Limbo set
without realism; horses played by
actors; everything abstracted |
|
Cabaret
(stage version) |
Memoir of
a straight male witness to the rise of
Nazism in Germany |
Everything
is staged in the context of a Wehrmacht
era Cabaret Act, controlled by a strange
and scary Emcee; Life
is
a cabaret, ol’ chum |
|
Cabaret
(film version) |
Memoir of
a bisexual male witness to the rise of
Nazism in Germany |
The
fantasy world of the Kit Kat Klub
comments on the actions that happen in
the very real world outside; Life is
not
a cabaret, old chump |
|
All
That Jazz |
Self-examination of a self-destructive
choreographer and director |
Life as a
series of musical numbers, under the
direction of the Angel of Death |
|
Barnum! |
Biography
of the master of the American Circus |
Musical in
the form of a series of circus acts |
Exercise
@
1. Make a list
of the content of your script. Then next to it,
write down how you are reflecting the content of
the script in the form of the script. Keep an
open mind, use your imagination and go out on a
limb to complete this exercise. From José
Rivera: “Be prepared to risk your entire
reputation every time you write, otherwise it's
not worth your audience's time.”
Che’Rae Adams is the Producing
Artistic Director of the Los Angeles Writers
Center. The above excerpts are from her book
“Writing is Hard and Other Whinny Baby Comments:
An Objective Approach to Looking at Your Own
Writing” with additional material by Jon Bastian
and Colm Byrne.
Che’Rae teaches writing workshops
in North Hollywood at the Lankershim Arts Center-her
next workshop starts Monday, July 29th-log
onto
www.cheraeadams.com to register.
|